Submitted by effinglibrarian on December 4, 2009 - 9:48am
Use this flowchart to decide whether you should become a librarian. I hope you find it helpful.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on November 7, 2009 - 11:57am
Submitted by effinglibrarian on October 26, 2009 - 4:01pm
Library school students answered reference questions on the street to raise money for charity. On one Saturday, they answered 63 questions and raised over $500.
I often wonder what my help is worth. When asked, I say, "a million dollars." But eight bucks a question isn't too bad. So far today, I would have made $224.
But since I'm a real librarian and not a student, I might be worth a little more.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on October 21, 2009 - 1:13pm
[visit my blog for uncensored version -- a while back I semi-promised to tone down the cursing.]
This trend of deprofessionalizing librarians, in Edinburgh's (Scotland) case, calling librarians "audience development officers" deserves a ginormous WTF??!!
Where do Audience Development Officers work? In a library, or in an Audience Development Station? I don't even know what those three words are supposed to mean. It's like they took all the words in the dictionary that could relate to a librarian and threw them all out and these were the three that were left. Seriously, all I can think is that an Audience Development Officer is just someone who opens the doors in the morning and lets people into the library.
Culture leader Cllr Deidre Brock said: "Growing use of the internet for reference and information is enabling us to structure the service so that our staff can better cater to our customers' needs."
Really? "Enabling" Let's put that positive spin on a bad situation.
So Dierdre is telling us that libraries are killing off the librarians.
Figures show there were only 66 full-time equivalent (FTE) qualified librarians in May this year, compared to 85.2 a year earlier. And 24 per cent of the city's 26 libraries no longer employ a head librarian.
Under the council's libraries review, all 300 staff are to be given new job roles and job descriptions, while staff have new teams and managers.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on September 11, 2009 - 11:42am
(For Delayed Release)
A small district in Any County, America, is changing the face of public libraries. Introducing AnyBookLibraries™, a new style of library that celebrates imagination, research and solitude. Studies have shown that people who are left alone quietly at their local library are less likely to become assholes and annoy others.
Recent changes to libraries have moved them away from physical books and into econtent. Downloadable materials dominated the menu of traditional library offerings; but AnyBookLibraries™ is willing to move forward to engage readers with solid, tangible, physical resources. Traditionally, libraries have been spending their tax dollars on materials their users couldn't even see unless they carried some electronic handheld device in with them. But the new philosophy surrounding the AnyBookLibraries approach gives readers a world of exploration that they experience with their senses, free of that expensive, electronic crutch.
The AnyBookLibraries™ model was designed to help libraries remain relevant by offering books to their customers. Books and books and more books. They offer programming around books, technology for improving access to books, and a "reasonably adequate" level of customer service so that everyone who walks into an AnyBookLibraries™ feels welcome, so long as they silence their phones, spray a little Febreze under their pits, and can keep their mouths shut.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on August 27, 2009 - 11:17am
7 of 10 parents want their kids to be teachers. When asked about kids becoming librarians, parents said, "That's a job?"
(from twitter, and no, the parents didn't really say that.. it's a joke)
Submitted by effinglibrarian on August 6, 2009 - 1:18pm
When events happen around the world, Twittererers send their tweets to alert us all. But what happens when Twitter isn't there to accept our 140-character thought balloons? Where do we say what we need to say when our saying place shuts down?
Twitter has been down or mostly down for at least two hours. What happens to all those tweets that never got tweeted? Are they saved in Tweetdeck awaiting confirmation that they can fly off to achieve Tweetisfaction?
Submitted by effinglibrarian on August 6, 2009 - 10:05am
I just saw that I could only comment if I register or log in?
What are pseudonymous commenters supposed to do when we can no longer comment anonymously? (log in, first? but I'm really really really lazy!)
Submitted by effinglibrarian on July 22, 2009 - 10:07am
In response to Restore the Noble Purpose of Libraries, by William H. Wisner:
I'm sorry to tell you, Mr. Wisner, but the Noble Library is dead.
It died when my local library purchased a vinyl copy of the album KC and the Sunshine Band back in 1976. Yes, I agree "Boogie Shoes" is an awesome song, but I have to place the death of the traditional, noble, enlightened library at that ignoble event. Up to then, the library never bought any popular music: no Led Zepellin or Rolling Stones or The Who or David Bowie. There were only albums of Prokofiev, Mozart or the Boston Pops.
And librarians have been dealing with the loss for the last thirty years.
The Kübler-Ross Five Stages of Grief are: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance. And librarians are smack in the middle of this process.
Some say the Denial stage is still ongoing, but I'm pretty sure it ended around the time your library made you learn about the "23 Things" and "Library 2.0." If creating ten different online accounts and solving the accompanying CAPTCHAs didn't shake you from that initial defensive response, then you're so deluded you probably think The Beatles will still get back together one day (all four of them).
Submitted by effinglibrarian on July 16, 2009 - 2:53pm
Yes, I'm still pondering Free: The Future of a Radical Price by Chris Anderson. (See my other blog.)
This week Twitter was hacked. Someone on Twitter's staff had their Gmail account opened by someone who shoudln't have access. Then, because we are all so connected, the hacker was able to access stuff like Google Docs and anything else that we all find google-icious.
And from what I see now, TechCrunch published online some of the hacked (stolen) documents, and Twitter states,
"We are in touch with our legal counsel about what this theft means for Twitter, the hacker, and anyone who accepts and subsequently shares or publishes these stolen documents."
Well, going back to Free, I'm wondering what value intellectual property has when the product is free. If Twitter is free to use, and not publicly traded, then what is the current value of its corporate secrets or intellectual property?
Twitter must have value as a company. They have investors who probably hope to turn their investments into yachtfuls of money. But what is the intellectual property value of free in dollars? Do you have a right to keep competitors from stealing something even if if's free? Does something that's free have any monetary value at all?
I know that free isn't always free. A bowl of free chocolates on a sample table doesn't give me permission to eat the same brand of chocolates that are for sale in the candy aisle.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on July 1, 2009 - 10:33am
I keep reading news stories about people ditching their cell phones and dumping cable TV and saving money, but none of these people are my friends. My friends have everything: smartphones with full Internet, smart 42" LCD televisions, smart kitchen appliances, smartpants.
Me, I wear the same old dumb pants and my cell phone only makes phone calls, which I only make about 3-4 times a week. But it only costs me $7 a month. I don't need my phone to do everything, and especially not right now. I grew up in a time when you had to find a phone, so whatever I need to do or say can wait ten minutes. Really? You absolutely need to text someone "lol" right now?
So Cheap is cool. Or so says The Ultimate Cheapskate. The one thing I disagree with is that America's economy has changed from a saving economy to a spending economy. Whole industries are built on constantly moving dollars, not stationary ones like in banks or CDs or treasury notes. Money needs to change hands very rapidly otherwise we will all see just how broke we really are. It's like a game of musical chairs with 10 people and 2 chairs; as long as we keep moving, none of us will end up on our asses.
So Cheap for America shouldn't be about saving; it should be about spending. But spending in a way that creates jobs. Cheap is putting people to work.
And since we love our smartphones so much, I think we should combine the two and use our phones to create jobs.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on June 8, 2009 - 6:18pm
In the Pixar movie UP, Ellie shows a picture that she "tore from a library book."
Well, she dies in the movie, so, 'nuff said about that. Right, kids?
Submitted by effinglibrarian on June 6, 2009 - 11:25pm
Or maybe it's a gadgetocracy or an webocracy, but I don't care what you call it because I'm against it.
As a result of another study that confirms that a tiny minority controls the majority of output, following ones done in the last few years on Digg and Wikipedia contributors, the.effing.librarian has decided to stick to his guns when making decisions regarding patron privacy, social networking, and life, the universe and everything.
Just as the richest ten percent of us possess ninety percent of the world's wealth, ten percent of the users of every social networking site can claim ninety percent of the content. The most recent study on Twitter adds to this theory.
So this is why I oppose giving patrons more control over their library records or borrowing history and privacy, or incorporating more social networking tools into our online library presence. We would make ten percent of the people happy at the expense of the rest.
I know that it's not ninety percent who would unhappy with the changes, but I'm pretty damn sure it would be over half. I'm sure over half our patrons are years away from understanding any of the consequences of online privacy. And I don't like to make decisions that piss off over half of the people; I can usually only kick one person's ass at a time, at work, when I'm drunk, and I don't need a second patron hitting me on the head with a flower pot from behind. However comical that may appear.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on May 21, 2009 - 4:00pm
Submitted by effinglibrarian on May 20, 2009 - 8:37am
What makes a great search engine? The first rule apparently, is that it must have fewer letters than "Google."
Last year brought Cuil, and now Microsoft presentes Kumo. Or is it pronounced Kumo? (See? You don't know either.)
Kumo is named for the little boy in the Japanese anime, "My Clumsy Evil Fighting Sister from the Future is a Cat Robot."
But on the first rule, Microsoft is a success. Kumo definitely has fewer letters than Google. But it's still two syllables, so it's not any easier to say.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on May 18, 2009 - 1:20pm
I just saw a news story that says Facebook actively blocks users with unsual names. So how does the effing librarian get to keep his account when Alicia Istanbul lost hers?
I'm kind of offended that my fake name isn't fake enough to alert Facebook's name goons. My fake first name is Effing and my fake last name is Librarian; is there a country where that's common?
Submitted by effinglibrarian on May 12, 2009 - 6:37pm
Submitted by effinglibrarian on May 1, 2009 - 10:29am
If you had a paperback-sized device that allowed you watch any movie or show on demand, anywhere, for free, would you still read books?
Submitted by effinglibrarian on April 29, 2009 - 11:22am
I don't know if you noticed, but there's a lot of stuff I need to do. And that's it. If there's an answer for why someone quits a blog, then, "I got other shit to do," is it.
People talk about "tipping points," and I hit mine when there was something I missed because I was being the.effing.librarian. I was blogging or tweeting or commenting and I missed something that my real life should be doing.
And that's when I realized that I had to stop.
Submitted by effinglibrarian on April 22, 2009 - 7:54am
FREE EFFING BOOK GIVEAWAY
The Effing Librarian blog is finished. What? You never read it? Go back to your Dostoyevsky, egghead.