- LISWire: Santa Barbara and Ventura Colleges of Law Choose ByWater Solutions’ Koha Support
- LISWire: EBSCO Publishing and EBSCO Information Services Merge
- LISWire: Skip Prichard named OCLC President and CEO
- LISWire: Brill Licenses Arabic Translation of the Encyclopaedia of Islam to Tunisia
- LISWire: The Nigeria Natural Medicine Development Agency Goes Live on LibLime Koha 4.14


Comments
That's really interesting and a little unnerving
I just tried it out with two searches, and given the Common Wisdom about who sucks and who's great, I probably shouldn't mention the results. (In both cases, a newish search engine starting with "B" seemed to provide the most apt set of results.)
This deserves further attention...not that it will change anyone's mind.
Similar results
It's not the best methodology, but for my test searches I searched myself, my friends and the names of websites I'm associated with. B*ng was the clear winner, breaking my Google-loving heart, with the most relevant results. I tried some less personal searches and B*ng was still the best.
I think I need to rethink my life.
--Terry, GameCouch.com
not so sure
I tried looking for a specific item, and I used quotation marks ("In My Book") . The B* engine (why are we being so discrete?) would not include the word 'in' despite it being in quotes.
Continuing on the 'In' theme, I looked up "In A Goda Da Vida", and it couldn't guess what I was looking up, whereas G* could. Y* had mixed results on the latter, could find it spelled incorrectly one way but not another.
unbingable
I'm being discrete so my praise for Bing can't be googled. Or binged.
--Terry, GameCouch.com
3 out of 4 for Google
I tried 4 quick tests and 3 out of 4 were Google, one Yahoo! I do love this though, it's interesting to see just how different the results can be.